Search for: "Screws v. State" Results 781 - 800 of 1,141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2010, 3:03 am by SHG
By most accounts, oral argument in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:49 am by Courtney Minick
It turns out that a 1992 US Supreme Court Case, Quill Corp. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:49 am by Courtney Minick
It turns out that a 1992 US Supreme Court Case, Quill Corp. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 3:39 am by SHG
” --Associate Justice Antonin Scalia in City of Ontario v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
  In fact, a large reason for the Supreme Court’s decision last year in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:59 pm by Gene Quinn
Government Accounting Office (GAO) found based on a hypothetical scenario they scored (see Appendix V) back in 2002. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by Kelly
(PlagiarismToday) Sweden Man fined for publishing links to legal sports broadcast (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom Prime Minister: UK needs US-style fair use to spur innovation (ArsTechnica) (Excess Copyright) Independent review of the IP system launched (IPKat) (Michael Geist) (Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) UK government says software patents should be easier to obtain (IAM) New UK government IP review must ask the right questions (IAM) Ministry of Sound gives up P2P claims (TechnoLlama) United… [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
We've already posted a couple of times about the Thorogood v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 4:07 am by Russ Bensing
  The latter happened last week in State v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 3:29 am by Russ Bensing
  I’ve even had lawyers tell me how they might have screwed something up. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm by Bexis
P. 8(a) adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Ashcroft v. [read post]