Search for: "Security-First National Bank v. United States"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2014, 7:47 am
Texas), and national security and the First Amendment (Holder v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am
Sundquist, 13-852, a case involving the power of a state to restrict an out-of-state national bank’s exercise of its fiduciary powers in that state. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:50 am
National Australia Bank, the plaintiffs’ lawyers developed a number of theories to try to circumvent Morrison to assert claims under the U.S. securities laws on behalf of investors who purchased their shares in the defendant foreign company on a foreign exchange. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:45 am
§ 1605(a)(2), the express definition of “agency” in the FSIA, the factors set forth in First National City Bank v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:09 am
The court said that the allegation that a shareholder placed a buy order in the United States that was then executed outside the U.S. does not “standing alone” establish that the shareholder “incurred irrevocable liability in the United States. [read post]
6 May 2014, 10:09 am
The Second Circuit as a matter of first impression, considered whether the bar on extraterritorial application of the United States securities laws, as set forth in Morrison v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:10 am
Two days later, [he] flew back to the United States. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:28 pm
The first is Federal National Mortgage Association v. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 8:31 pm
Kiobel v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
The Court also relisted for the first time in Federal National Mortgage Association v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:48 am
Arguing for the government of Argentina in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
The inventor secures exclusive rights in return for new, ingenious, useful and unobvious disclosures and dedication of the invention to the public when the term expires. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
See United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:24 am
Sundquist 13-852Issue: Whether a state can restrict a national bank’s exercise of its fiduciary powers in connection with real property in that state if the bank is authorized to act as a fiduciary by the Comptroller of the Currency and not prohibited from doing so by the (different) state in which the bank is “located” under 12 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:25 pm
TERRI FRITZ, Appellee. 2nd District.Mortgage foreclosure -- Dismissal -- Failure to prosecute -- Record activity -- Motion to amend complaint was a sufficient filing to avoid dismissal for failure to prosecuteDEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO., Appellant, v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am
Yet recent commentaries on the Necessary and Proper Clause have neglected to consider the relationship between the “powers vested in the Government of the United States” to which this clause refers and Wilson’s defense of implied and inherent national powers in his bank essay. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 10:21 am
United States as exhibit A.) [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:38 pm
Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
Perhaps a set of basic governance devices as models would serve a useful purpose as well.In any case, this has been a long time coming in the United States. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 10:03 am
The Court first noted that SLUSA focuses on transactions in covered securities, not uncovered securities. [read post]
