Search for: "Selective Draft Law Cases" Results 781 - 800 of 4,255
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2016, 11:42 pm by Mark Summerfield
  The draft Chapter 8 has been completely reworked in the final Chapter 9, and the proposed recommendation has been discarded. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Legal Beagle
There is no definition of consistency in the draft, and it seems to me that those who would form a sentencing council would find some difficulty in knowing exactly what they were trying to do unless the legislation gave them a clear definition by which to judge their own views and decisions.That raises in a clear way the constitutional issue that underlies legislation. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am by INFORRM
   Point 5.7 is “Develop options for reform of libel laws to protect freedom of speech” – this is said to start in June 2010 and to end in March 2011 with a “Draft Defamation Bill for the reform of libel laws published for pre-legislative scrutiny” being published in that month. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 9:48 pm
By jettisoning the legal requirements of the applicable rules, and the mature and well-developed body of case law that has grown up around those rules, the principles are profoundly destructive of existing law.2. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 1:50 pm
  Distribution Agreement   New Jersey Law   Contract Drafting       (“Indirect” purchaser would lack antitrust standing). [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 9:23 pm
Draft papers, ideally in the range 15-35 pages, should be sent (in .pdf or .doc format) to angelina.fisher@nyu.edu by May 15, 2015. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:26 pm by sinclair
How much of your day would you estimate is devoted to drafting legal documents? [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:26 pm by sinclair
How much of your day would you estimate is devoted to drafting legal documents? [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 9:56 am by Giles Peaker
In this case, section 56(3) [additional licensing] and 80(9) [selective licensing] of Housing Act 2004 both contained a requirement to: take reasonable steps to consult persons who are likely to be affected by the designation; In this case, the Court found that people who lived or operated in areas of other boroughs adjoining Enfield would clearly be affected. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 1:09 pm by Giles Peaker
If that is the case, I’d suggest it doesn’t make an awful lot of sense to restrict possible RROs in this way. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 3:30 am by Jack Whittington
You have been selected because the attorney has confidence in your abilities as a law student and potential attorney. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am by Marie Louise
Here is Think IP Strategy’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 11:00 am by Donald Clarke
The FRL basically says that the state shall do this and that, and is empowered to do this and that, but pretty much all of that would have been the case without a FRL. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:30 pm by Aaron Pelley
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court State v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 10:42 pm by Marie Louise
Honeywell (Patents Post-Grant) (IPBiz) (Patently-O) US: ‘At home’ testing for BRCA gene mutations (Patent Docs) US: New draft guidance for industry: INDs – determining whether human research studies can be conducted without an IND (FDA Law Blog) US: Patent extensions: some academic perspectives? [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm by Robert B. Milligan
  In 2013, we expect to see social media continue to generate disputes in trade secret, computer fraud, and non-compete law, as well as in privacy law. [read post]