Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers"
Results 781 - 800
of 6,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2011, 11:28 pm
Bernt Hugenholtz € 110 Concise International and European Law – 2nd edition by Pierre Véron, Thomas Cottier € 180 Copyright Enforcement and the Internet by Irini Stamatoudi € 135 [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:02 am
In Iowa sellers have a duty to disclose underground tanks at the time of a sale, but knowledge can be a moving target to prove. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:53 am
Cir. 1992). [3] Jazz Photo Corp. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 9:50 am
Co., LLC v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:49 pm
” Sellers was lead counsel for the female plaintiffs in the landmark gender discrimination class action Wal-Mart v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 1:14 pm
The Court relied on Barnes v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:44 am
See BellSouth Telecomm., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 11:12 am
See, e.g., Chrysler v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 12:35 pm
What must sellers of such “stigmatized” properties disclose to buyers? [read post]
16 May 2016, 8:48 am
See: Allington Towers North, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:17 am
Lewis v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 10:57 am
Goad v Moulton (1885) 67 C 536.So in the case of a gift deed, the above language need not be included on the deed. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 5:49 am
Last week, Judge Jackson Kiser of the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia issued an opinion and order in Clement v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 7:51 am
., could be directly liable for third-party sellers’ infringement of trademarks owned by the Ohio State University, the U.S. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 8:12 am
Full disclosure of the identity of the restorer and the used nature of the product protects a seller of second-hand goods from liability for a trademark infringement claim. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 1:22 am
The district court’s judgment was affirmed in all other respects (Car-Freshner Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:48 am
Gebr Weber GmbH v Wittmer Putz v Medianess Electronics GmbH Joined cases C-65/09 and C-87/09; [2011] WLR (D) 210 “Where consumer goods, installed in good faith by the consumer, were not in conformity with the contract under which the consumer had purchased and and were restored to conformity by way of replacement, the seller was obliged pursuant to article 3(2)(3) of Parliament and Council Directive 1999/44/EC either to remove the goods from where they had been… [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:58 am
As is customary in business sale transactions, the sellers had to agree to certain restrictions on competitive activity. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 6:49 am
Our previews of the Illinois Supreme Court's September docket continue with Hartney Fuel Oil Co. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 12:27 pm
A recent drug bulk supplier case bears this out – and some unknown contract lawyer out there is probably feeling some heat because of it.The situation in Prestige Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
