Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 781 - 800
of 4,115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2016, 12:11 pm
But if not (and if the plaintiff is a public figure and the article is on a matter of public concern), then the Supreme Court’s decision in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 5:24 pm
That's the question presented in Ciminelli v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 2:52 pm
In a recent opinion, Hardeman County v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 11:16 am
CASE NAME: Joshua Walsh v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 am
(As indeed was soon confirmed - see U.S. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 4:32 am
Apparently, the Court of Appeals agreed, finding in Kubicki v Sharpe that the dispute hinged on precisely when Mother's "active duty" commenced. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:54 am
Supreme Court’s 2014 ruling in Halliburton v. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 12:28 pm
[There would be an interpretive question about Bolling v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm
[cite to LW v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 9:35 am
Murphy (later Sharp v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 5:54 am
" ' Baze v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
The Court of Appeal unanimously dismissed Mr Khuja’s appeal, with Sharp LJ giving the only judgment. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 5:39 am
To the extent his claims are reviewable and are based on the order on appeal, we conclude that Supreme Court properly granted defendants’ motion to dismiss because the record establishes that the statute of limitations on plaintiff’s legal malpractice claim expired on April 1, 2018, and plaintiff did not initiate the instant action until, at minimum, September 25, 2019 (see CPLR 214[6]; Sharp v Ferrante Law Firm, 220 AD3d 587, 587-588 [1st Dept 2023]). [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:00 am
Sharp v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 11:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am
Lachaux v Independent Print, Supreme Court to hear “serious harm” appeal On Tuesday and Wednesday 13 and 14 November 2018, the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs) will hear the appeal in Lachaux v Independent Print Limited & Anor UKSC 2017/0175, against the Court of Appeal decision of Davis LJ, with whom MacFarlane and Sharp LJJ concurred ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334). [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 8:44 pm
Sharpe, 347 U. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 11:17 am
McMahon v Watford Borough Council (2020) EWCA Civ 497 (and Kiefer v Hertsmere Borough Council ) We saw the approach of the Court of Appeal to the operation of the Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED) in possession proceedings in Luton Community Housing v Durdana. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 5:03 pm
In its complaint, Optical Devices relied exclusively on its agreements with various licensees, namely Sony Corporation, Sharp Corporation, and Sharp Electronics Corporation, to establish a domestic industry. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp & Others, a Chancery Division, England and Wales, ruling last week from Mr Justice Nugee [don't ask: the Kats haven't come across him either, but he is a Chancery judge], addressed an important preliminary issue. [read post]
