Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 781 - 800
of 4,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2020, 9:08 pm
Oklahoma and Sharp v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:00 am
In a separate opinion concurring in the judgment, Scalia (joined by Kennedy and Thomas) took sharp exception to what he called Roberts’ “Something for Everyone” approach. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:36 am
The additional Nokia v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Sharpe (1954) Cooper v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
” Take, for example, his statement that Burwell v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 9:46 am
In the process the article raises questions about how we should understand the scope of the achievement of those who sponsored and ratified the Reconstruction amendments.In the last part of “Optimistic Originalism” I discuss why Brown is commonly viewed as a “living constitutionalist” opinion (Here and elsewhere in these posts I put living constitutionalism in scare quotes because I think the real issue is how to understand the process of constitutional change outside… [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 10:06 pm
I have already written about the case of Marbrow v Sharpes Garden Services Ltd [2020] EWHC B26 (Costs) (10 July 2020) where the Senior Costs Judge Master Gordon-Saker declined the Claimant’s invitation to award pre-judgment interest on costs. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
Jones v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am
Millages in Hartford and New Haven, which lacked those turn-of-then-century adjustments, were essentially flat, but this followed sharp increases in the prior decade, with Hartford’s rate now 55 percent higher than it was in FY 2000, and New Haven’s up 23 percent.[5] Over the 20 most recent years for which collections data are available (1998-2017), Connecticut property tax collections rose 43 percent in real (inflation-adjusted) terms, which is not itself unusual. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
To hold otherwise would be to elevate the most brazen and longstanding injustices over the law, both rewarding wrong and failing those in the right.[10] The McGirt case was considered a companion case to Sharp v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
To hold otherwise would be to elevate the most brazen and longstanding injustices over the law, both rewarding wrong and failing those in the right.[10] The McGirt case was considered a companion case to Sharp v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:20 pm
Smith v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
In Gonzalez v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 8:34 am
The European Commission has failed the IoT industry so far, siding with yesterday's losers rather than tomorrow's winners, but as a result of negotiations (such as Sharp-Huawei), private lawsuits (such as Huawei v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 10:14 pm
Last week in Marbrow v Sharpes Garden Services Ltd [2020] EWHC B26 (Costs) (10 July 2020) the Senior Costs Judge Master Gordon-Saker handed down a reserved judgment in relation to three discreet issues where I acted for the Defendant paying party. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
Oklahoma and Sharp v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:53 am
Dambrot v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 4:15 pm
The first thing we learned this morning with the announcement of the decision in McGirt v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 7:51 am
The Court also issued a one line per curiam opinion in Sharp v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 7:03 am
In a separate order, the Court affirmed Sharp v. [read post]
