Search for: "Smith v. Smith" Results 781 - 800 of 16,110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2023, 7:07 pm by Anna Bower
He then proceeds to introduce the case that brings us all to the Miami federal courthouse—or, rather, that brought us here 27 hours ago: The United States of America v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 1:00 pm by Josh Blackman
"] On June 5, a Fifth Circuit panel (Smith, Higginson, and Willett) heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
On 7 June 2023, Mr Justice Marcus Smith handed down judgment with his FRAND determination.[1]  This is the second judgment issued by the English Courts containing a substantive FRAND determination since the pivotal judgment of the UK Supreme Court in 2020 in Unwired Planet (the first being the judgment of Mr Justice Mellor in InterDigital v Lenovo earlier this year). [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 10:43 pm by Florian Mueller
That was fortunate because Mr Justice Marcus Smith, the President of the CAT, suspended the livestream for the first couple of hours. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:50 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 16/06/23) East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22nd June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard 20th October 2022 Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland and another v Agnew and others (Northern Ireland), heard… [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am by INFORRM
IPSO 11063-22 Smith v The Mail on Sunday, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 12068-22 Kelly v scottishdailyexpress.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 14035-23 Tucker v oxfordmail.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation 12648-22 Grandon v hadleigh.nub.news, 3 Harassment (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 01109-23 Edinburgh Rape Crisis… [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 4:02 pm by Henry P Yang
This approach is consistent with the law, with support for example from a 1969 decision Smith Kline.Sir Robin finally remarked that there is no evidence that patents prevent innovation. [read post]