Search for: "Sparks v. Sparks"
Results 781 - 800
of 2,046
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2023, 4:25 am
The mixture of intimacy with the terror. https://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/supreme-preparation-what-attorneys-go-through-before-facing-the-nine Claim in digital storage patent referred to hardware or software and not to ineligible-for-patenting transitory signals. http://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/21-2263.OPINION.4-12-2023_2109603.pdf Patent on method for sending images lacked “inventive concept” Section 101 requires for patents claiming abstract ideas.… [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Circuit Court of Appeals, in ACA International v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 11:20 am
[6] Gravel v. [read post]
26 Dec 2024, 7:51 am
Regulatory Rollback and Legal Challenges The Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 7:31 am
The other charges might spark some debate, however, as they include terrorism (Charge IV), material support to an act of terrorism in the form of providing advice, training, and planning in support of the attack (Charge V), spying in preparation for the attack (Charge VI), and conspiracy (Charge IX). [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 7:48 am
”Sparks v. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 6:38 am
The work need not be novel; it need only possess a “spark” or “minimal degree” of creativity to be protected by copyright. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:32 am
Ryder Ripps is a self-described “conceptual artist” known for previous unconventional projects that have sparked controversy and discussion. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 11:16 am
(Eugene Volokh) Today’s Ezell v. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 2:46 am
The June 18, 2008 Ninth Circuit panel decision in Quon et al. v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 11:05 pm
Here is the abstract:The Federal Circuit's decision in State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 11:30 pm
The impact resulted in sparking and a subsequent fire in the surrounding brush. [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 7:03 am
” Other countries, such as Bulgaria, have recently introduced bans on same-sex “propaganda,” which has sparked discontent among LGBTQ+ activists and human rights organizations. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 9:31 am
Dist Bd. of Educ v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 6:31 am
From both sides of the “v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
Brochtrup v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 6:30 am
The landmark case was Jimmo v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 11:45 pm
" Jacobellis v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:25 pm
At issue in United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 9:03 am
This jurisprudence has profoundly impacted the law’s scope and reach — and has sparked intense policy discussions, including recently introduced Congressional bills seeking to reverse one of the cases discussed below (Doe v. [read post]
