Search for: "Standard Jury Instructions Criminal Cases" Results 781 - 800 of 1,723
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2015, 10:04 am by Christopher Simon
A party in a case, whether criminal or civil, has a right to be present when his or her case is being adjudicated. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 10:55 am by Rory Little
Eleven of the cases in which review has already been granted for the next Term are criminal-law or related (under my generous standards). [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 3:28 pm
We asked the prosecutor at oral argument if, before this case, logrolling had been the basis of a criminal conviction in the history of the United States. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 9:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Tasks: 1.Manages and oversees criminal, civil and juvenile cases as assigned by the Chief Judge. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 11:05 am
For reasons already explained, enforcing the government’s obligations is critical to achieving a level playing field in criminal cases. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  We don't even know if the statements in the particular case are a crime or not.We know that a jury cannot be instructed to merely find that a reasonable person would find the statements threatening. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 8:02 am
Suffice to say that viewing what juries do in actual cases will give us a much better understanding of jury behavior and provide valuable information for different techniques in presenting evidence, instructing juries and jury management. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 2:50 pm
Few, if any, courts instruct juries on the pitfalls of eyewitness identification or caution them to be skeptical of eyewitness testimony. 2. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 3:12 pm by Sean Hanover
The Supreme Court of Delaware is silent about the matter -- and that means you have to hunt through case law to create non-standard instructions. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 3:51 pm by Law Offices of David L. Freidberg, P.C.
No Jury Instruction for Reasonable Doubt in Illinois In this case, the jury sent a note to the court asking whether its definition of reasonable doubt was 80 percent, 70 percent, or 60 percent. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:18 am by Emma Quinn-Judge
”  Because of the way Asher had presented his defense, the trial judge did not give the jury specific instructions about Asher’s right as a police officer to use force. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:44 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States threw out the jury instruction used in that case but left the door open to an instruction based on "recklessness," which will, I believe, get to the same result in nearly all cases. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm by Peter Margulies
Cases like Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 10:51 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Bldg., Inc., 445 So.2d 1015, 1018 (Fla.1984); see, also, Standard Jury Instruction – Civil Cases 401.3. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
At Elonis’s criminal trial, the federal district judge instructed the jury that, for purposes of whether Elonis had issued threats prohibited by the statute, “[a] statement is a true threat [subject to prosecution] when a defendant intentionally makes a statement in a context or under such circumstances wherein a reasonable person would foresee that the statement would be interpreted by those to whom the maker communicates the statement as a serious expression… [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
Because it decided that Elonis's jury was not properly instructed about the meaning of the federal criminal threat statute, the Supreme Court did not decide whether Elonis's speech was protected by the First Amendment. [read post]