Search for: "State Road Department v. United States"
Results 781 - 800
of 908
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2009, 5:20 am
In support, the State cites United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 7:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:35 am
United States v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:39 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:45 am
Department of Justice adopt a more global prosecution approach. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 4:23 pm
In Gentry v. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 4:23 pm
In Gentry v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 9:50 am
Hypo 2: United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
" Finally, the Fourth Circuit found that this appeal was not moot, even though Madrigal had already voluntarily departed the United States: "In Sibron v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:50 am
One of the author's partners, Marilyn Barrett -- a former chair of the Taxation Section of the State Bar of California and the Los Angeles County Bar Association and who works in the Tax Department of Jeffer Mangels Butler & Marmaro LLP -- assists clients on corporate and partnership tax matters and tax controversy matters, and serves as outside general counsel to mid-market public and privately held companies. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 8:27 am
Despite the recognition of the issue, as the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) has noted that congestion has nearly tripled in the last twenty five years, that same time period has seen an 239 percent increase in highway spending. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 9:09 am
Massad, William V. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 12:26 am
The lawyers, led by Shayana Kadidal of the Center for Constitutional Rights, contend that many former Gitmo inmates have continued to suffer severe personal hardship since their release because the United States has not cleared their legal status. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 12:32 am
Chung highlights Justice Field's dissent in Juilliard v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 8:26 am
Given that Membership of the EU is dependent upon Member States adhering to the Convention, does the UK intend to pull out of Europe or alternatively implement the ECtHR decision in Hirst v UK(No2)? [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 12:35 am
Washington D.C. is "the window through which the world looks into our house," wrote the Justice Department in the Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae in Brown v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 8:04 pm
In Harvey v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 11:35 am
Two very low points for victims rights came from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 5:49 am
January 5, 2009),* relying on United States v. [read post]
