Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 781 - 800 of 12,642
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2009, 1:33 pm
The SEC announced today that the United States District Court for the Central District of California entered final judgments, by consent, permanently enjoining Meridian Holdings, Inc. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 9:03 pm
New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc. (2001) which is an appellate decision from a state court in California which... [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Kara M. Maciel
  For the second time in a year, a United States District Court has held that claims based on California’s meal and rest period laws are preempted by federal law. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 1:41 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Seyfarth Synopsis: The Fifth Appellate District provided its prediction for the California Supreme Court’s decision in Adolph v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 6:56 pm
The State of California does not allow a debtor to use Federal bankruptcy exemptions under Title 11 of the United States Code ("Title 11 U.S.C.). [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:01 pm by Mali Friedman
Additionally, as a practical matter, some service providers already require a search warrant before disclosing stored content to law enforcement based on the Sixth Circuit’s 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
The United States Supreme Court and multiple California courts have held that a CBA may require arbitration of an employee’s statutory claims only if the CBA includes a “clear and unmistakable” waiver of the right to bring those statutory claims in a judicial forum. [read post]
The United States Supreme Court and multiple California courts have held that a CBA may require arbitration of an employee’s statutory claims only if the CBA includes a “clear and unmistakable” waiver of the right to bring those statutory claims in a judicial forum. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 10:26 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Sega of America Inc et al United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaCase No. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 9:21 am
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470, the United States Supreme Court considered whether the abbreviated 510(k) approval process preempts state law causes of action. [read post]