Search for: "State v. A. T. D." Results 781 - 800 of 23,969
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
United States and then again in the 1990 decision, Employment Div. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:06 am by Eric Goldman
Once-a-year postings aren’t very useful LOL.] [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Judge Weinstein observed that when the hand waving stopped, “[t]here is no evidence that plaintiffs were exposed to the far higher concentrations involved in both animal and industrial exposure studies. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm by Robert Liles
  Not surprisingly, by the late 1980’s, several Members of Congress remained concerned that there still weren’t sufficient safeguards in place to protect the FEHBP program from health care fraud and abuse. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 1:35 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
First, the court found that the state consumer protection law claims couldn’t cover the US because it wasn’t enough to allege that “substantially similar statutes” exist in all other states is insufficient, and they only cited California and Missouri consumer protection law in the complaint. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
But officials broke "[v]irtually every promise" they made. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 5:29 am by Rose Hughes
In the field of computer implemented inventions, the term "credibility" has long been used as the test for whether an invention has any technical effect (Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, I-D-9.2.8). [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Departments establishment of the IDR fee for post-February 20, 2025 disputes and their previous December 15, 2023 announcement of the full reopening of the IDR portal for all dispute categories are part of the Departments’ ongoing response to the August 3, 2023 Federal District court ruling in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]