Search for: "State v. Bone" Results 781 - 800 of 1,559
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2013, 1:01 pm by Anubha Sinha
The “mobile distribution” rights were the bone of contention in the proceedings. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 8:02 am by Steven Boranian
By then turning an activation mechanism, each distractor slowly separates the bone sections, allowing the formation of new bone. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 6:32 am by Joy Waltemath
Specifically, the Second Circuit referenced its March ruling in Lundy v Catholic Health System of Long Island, Inc and its July opinion in Nakahata v New York-Presbyterian Healthcare System, Inc. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 6:00 am by D. Todd Varellas
Unlike other states, in Kentucky, drivers are presumed to have limited rights to sue unless they file a special form rejecting no-fault limitations. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 12:48 pm
Coast Guard’s website states, “Alcohol is even more hazardous on the water than on land. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
[v][v] In particular Hughes found the inventive concept was: “zoledronate is a useful inhibitor of bone resorption in rats a [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 12:09 pm by Tom Lamb
For an example of an Infuse lawsuit against Medtronic filed after the Yale study was released in mid-June 2013, we get this information from a June 21, 2013 news report, "Medtronic profited from improper bone graft sales, California suit claims": In a jointly filed California state court suit, 37 plaintiffs say they were injured by undergoing spinal fusion procedures in which Medtronic’s Infuse bone graft product was used in a way unapproved by the federal… [read post]