Search for: "State v. Burns"
Results 781 - 800
of 2,997
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2015, 8:27 pm
We have agreed that some symbols, cross burnings for example (Virginia v. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 11:48 am
Shah v. [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Moreover, "[u]nder settled principles, the doctrine of estoppel will not provide eligibility [to retirement benefits] where by statute a person clearly does not qualify" (Matter of Price v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 107 AD3d 1212, 1216 [3d Dept 2013] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citation omitted]; see Matter of Schuyler v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 158 AD3d 909, 912 [3d… [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Moreover, "[u]nder settled principles, the doctrine of estoppel will not provide eligibility [to retirement benefits] where by statute a person clearly does not qualify" (Matter of Price v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 107 AD3d 1212, 1216 [3d Dept 2013] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citation omitted]; see Matter of Schuyler v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 158 AD3d 909, 912 [3d… [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 6:58 am
In Jenkins v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 3:17 pm
The matter, Rockland County v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm
For example, conservative jurists in cases like Town of Greece v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Vivendi Universal in 2012 and $253 million in the employment case Velez v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 8:22 am
In Dixon v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 7:00 am
Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619 (1973); United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:45 pm
Finally, the ECtHR recalls that the dominant position that State institutions occupy, requires them to exercise restraint in the use of criminal proceedings such as in cases to protect the reputation of the Prime Minister as a representative of the State. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm
She called this a ‘burning issue’ and ‘absolutely unacceptable in domestic violence cases’. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:30 am
Kaufman v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 12:22 pm
” Philip Morris markets the IQOS system as a “heat-not-burn” system, claiming that the heat does not result in burning of the tobacco. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 5:00 pm
” NAACP v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:56 am
Who knew that former Oakland County Circuit Judge Mark Goldsmith, now on the federal bench in Detroit, would play the central role in the presidential vote recount litigation that has burned a quick hole into the federal and state courts here in Michigan over the past few weeks. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm
Billing Fraud: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE WON'T DISMISS MEDICARE FRAUD DEFENDANTS, United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 5:19 am
While the Supreme Court grapples with the issue of who qualifies as a "supervisor" in this context in Vance v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 10:02 am
There are comparable state laws.The U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 8:20 am
Kirk v. [read post]
