Search for: "State v. CERTIFIED SERVICES, INC."
Results 781 - 800
of 1,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2013, 7:04 am
By Lynn Kappelman and Anthony Califano In Awuah, et al. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm
AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 5:45 am
See Kingdomware Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 11:17 am
(Orthodontic Centers of Texas, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
§ 2679, requires the United States to be substituted as defendant in place of a government employee facing a common-law tort suit, if the Attorney General certifies that the employee was acting within the scope of his employment. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:03 am
Rachael Kent v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:45 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Mayo Foundation v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 6:40 am
Salon FAD v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am
OPINION EVELYN V. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 7:48 pm
National Default Servicing, Inc., another unanimous decision. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
__X__ It does not contain a proper certificate of service. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:35 am
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:11 pm
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 4:42 am
Founder and Executive Director of the Coalition for Responsible Healthcare Policy and its PROJECT COPE: the Coalition on Patient Empowerment and a Fellow in the American Bar Foundation and State Bar of Texas, Ms. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 7:31 am
As to rounding, the Court of Appeal relied on See’s Candy Shops, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 10:03 am
Marion County Department of Child Services and Child Advocates, Inc. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or… [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:00 am
CashCall, Inc. v. [read post]