Search for: "State v. CERTIFIED SERVICES, INC." Results 781 - 800 of 1,644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
§ 2679, requires the United States to be substituted as defendant in place of a government employee facing a common-law tort suit, if the Attorney General certifies that the employee was acting within the scope of his employment. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 7:48 pm by Adam Levitin
National Default Servicing, Inc., another unanimous decision. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:35 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:11 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 4:42 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Founder and Executive Director of the Coalition for Responsible Healthcare Policy and its PROJECT COPE: the Coalition on Patient Empowerment and a Fellow in the American Bar Foundation and State Bar of Texas, Ms. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 7:31 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
As to rounding, the Court of Appeal relied on See’s Candy Shops, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 10:03 am
Marion County Department of Child Services and Child Advocates, Inc. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or… [read post]