Search for: "State v. David O."
Results 781 - 800
of 2,040
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2014, 10:56 am
These bylaw provisions gained notoriety in the recent case of ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:15 am
Harris and David S. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 6:15 pm
By way of background, the United States Supreme Court has held, in the landmark case Garcetti v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:52 am
In 1993, the Supreme Court decided the case of Ratzlaf v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 7:19 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 5:27 pm
The court’s landmark decision, O’Neill v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
After the CJEU gave its opinion, the controversy came back home, with David recounting how it went. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:36 am
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” Washington State Supreme Court O’Neill v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 3:51 am
2021 NY Slip Op 30429(U) February 12, 2021 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 153713/2020 Judge: David Benjamin Cohen. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 3:58 am
” At Slate, David Gans explains why, although all eyes have been on Justice Anthony Kennedy as the potential swing vote in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 2:30 am
In another development yesterday, the state of North Carolina asked the court to put a hold on a lower-court order invalidating the state’s legislative maps. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
By Marty Lederman and David LubanThis coming Friday, the Supreme Court Justices are scheduled to consider, at conference, the government’s nominal “petition for certiorari” in No. 17-654, Hargan v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:13 am
Sullivan, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Sunday, January 17, 2016 Tags: Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Derivatives, Investment Company Act, Investor protection, Leverage,Mutual funds, No-action letters, Private funds, Risk, Risk management, Rule 18f-4, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities Regulation, Swaps PECO v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:13 am
As Professor David O'Brien explains, "A Court composed of Justices who genuinely value 'dual federalism' arguably would strongly favor the states in the area of implied federal preemption. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:35 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:24 am
McAdams, Reforming Entrapment Doctrine in United States v Hollingsworth, 74 U Chi L Rev 1795 (2007) Thomas J. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
In Fisher v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 2:07 pm
Supreme Court in New York State Rifle & Pistol Asssoc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 8:52 am
As now retired Justice O’Connor put it, concurring in Allied Bruce Terminix v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm
John O. [read post]
