Search for: "State v. Drew" Results 781 - 800 of 2,862
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2012, 1:33 am by INFORRM
The Lord Chief Justice drew attention to Lord Diplock’s comments in Wright v British Railways Board [1983] 2 AC 773 that the Court of Appeal is “generally speaking the tribunal best qualified to set guidelines for judges trying such actions” particularly given the “inescapably artificial and conventional nature of the assessment of damages for non-economic loss”. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:15 pm by Cyrus Farivar
Local journalist and artist Susie Cagle drew this sketch at the June 3, 2014 EFF v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 6:08 am by Chris
Trayvon Martin George Zimmerman’s lawyer seeks to limit pretrial publicity (Orlando Sentinel) Officials reveal details of George Zimmerman’s jail activities, purchases (Orlando Sentinel) Meet the Judge Who Drew George Zimmerman’s Case (Wall Street Journal Law Blog) State of Florida v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 7:22 am by SCOTUSblog
(Steven Lubet, The Hill) United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
The debates drew a massive audience and for a brief period focused the attention of millions of voters. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 1:10 am
Back in June 2007, IPBiz noted that a response of patent practitioners to KSR v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am by INFORRM
On the first question, the Judge drew parallels to ZXC v Bloomberg LP [2022] AC 1158 which established, as a starting point, that a person under criminal investigation has a reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 4:49 am by Edith Roberts
United States and United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The Texas court drew up interim plans for the State’s rapidly approaching primaries, getting no deference to the Legislature’s plans. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The Texas court drew up interim plans for the State’s rapidly approaching primaries, getting no deference to the Legislature’s plans. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 7:15 am by Anna Christensen
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral argument in Flores-Villar v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am by INFORRM
AWQC drew attention to both domestic and European statutory language which drew a distinction between “contravention” and “damage” caused by the contravention. [read post]