Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 781 - 800 of 9,073
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2016, 10:46 am by Harold O'Grady
One of the first decisions to address the question was Rutgers v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 3:00 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Texas seeking to attach the MAYA and MARANGO under the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 61.001, et seq. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
Under § 1400(b), a domestic corporation "resides" only in its state of incorporation.TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 7:51 am by Peter Steinmeyer
Judge Ruben Castillo, the Chief Judge for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, recently declined to follow a widely publicized Illinois Appellate Court decision in which the Appellate Court held that, absent other consideration, two years of employment is required consideration for a restrictive covenant in Illinois. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 3:30 am by Scott Harman
The district court gave insufficient weight to the government’s interest, specifically the diplomatic concerns that judicial approval of a transfer imposes. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:25 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  In reversing the First District Court of Appeal’s contrary decision, the Supreme Court resolved the conflict between the decisions in Azusa Land Reclamation Co. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 2:18 am
The court held a sealed hearing as to the proceedings taking place in the State Bar of Arkansas. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:52 am by Andrew Frisch
The courts may nonetheless decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction if “the state law claim substantially predominates over the claim or claims over which the district court has original jurisdiction. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:18 am by Peter Margulies
Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Mathews v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:19 am by Peter Mahler
In the one exceptional case decided by the Idaho District Court in 2020, entitled Zafer v Spengler, the court found that dissolution “does not present a complex question of state law, nor does it have any significant impact on state public policy, such that this Court needs to relinquish jurisdiction. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 8:46 pm
The district court denied the motion. [read post]