Search for: "State v. Franc" Results 781 - 800 of 3,159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2010, 3:37 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie, L’Oréal (UK) Limited v eBay International AG, eBay Europe SARL and eBay (UK) Limited Advocate General Jääskinen delivered his keenly awaited opinion. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 6:59 am by Allan Erbsen
An interesting aspect of the Court's recent decision in Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 3:55 am by INFORRM
In Sube & Anor v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Anor (Rev 1) [2020] EWHC 1125 (QB) the High Court emphatically rejected a claim for harassment against media organisations. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Clause 3.2 stated they they would not publish, in any jurisdiction, any articles or statements which “refer to” Mr Mionis or his “immediate family”. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:35 am
Taken by itself and out of context, the question "Is it acceptable that the European Union abandons its powers in favour of the Member States? [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 9:04 pm
It called for "early, full and effective implementation" of a 1949 resolution stating that the North African land -- various portions of which had been subjected to rule by Italy, France, and Britain -- "shall be constituted a united and independent sovereign state. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:01 am by David Mead, University of East Anglia
This is clearly out of line with the well-known principle, stemming from Ezelin v France, that no one should lose their right to protest peacefully simply because others are violent. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:57 am
Proof of acquired distinctiveness may be adduced for all Member States concerned, or separately for different Member States or groups of Member States. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 6:47 am
`In alleging fraud or mistake, a party must state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:13 pm by Walter Olson
Human Rights Council finds much to criticize about U.S. rights record, including inadequate attention to rights of clean water and sanitation; State Department response to “universal periodic review”; “The President Can’t Increase Congress’s Power Simply by Signing a Treaty” [Ilya Shapiro, Cato, on Supreme Court case of U.S. v. [read post]