Search for: "State v. Franc" Results 781 - 800 of 2,815
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2008, 10:01 pm
-Mexico border, the United States purchased Florida, renounced any claim to Texas, and agreed to a fixed western boundary for lands it had obtained from France in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 10:29 pm by Team
On July 7th 2011, the grand chamber of the Court stated again in its judgment Al-Skeini and others v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 10:29 pm by Team
On July 7th 2011, the grand chamber of the Court stated again in its judgment Al-Skeini and others v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 4:01 pm
To be on the safe side, the Bundesgerichtshof decided to stay the proceedings and referred the following question to the Court for a preliminary ruling:‘Is Article 5(3) of Regulation … 44/2001 to be interpreted as meaning that the harmful event occurred in one Member State (Member State A) if the tort or delict which forms the subject-matter of the proceedings or from which claims are derived was committed in another Member State (Member State B) and… [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 1:24 am
Saunders QUEENS COUNTYFamily LawCourt Finds Aunt Forfeits Right to Child Support Due to Her False Sex Abuse Claims Against Father Matter of Frances W. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 9:41 pm
Leroux v Brown had determined that s 4 of the Statute of Frauds (UK) was procedural, and that an oral agreement made in France was not enforceable in England despite being enforceable under its proper law. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by assoulineberlowe
Supreme Court reversed a decision of the 11th Circuit (Energy Power Conversion France SAS, Corp. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 2:10 am by CMS
The relevant provision of the New York Convention – article V(1)(a) – can be found in section 103(2)(b) of the Arbitration Act, and states that “the recognition or enforcement of the award may be refused if the person against whom it is invoked proves (…) that the arbitration agreement was not valid under the law to which the parties subjected it or, failing any indication thereon, under the law of the country where the award was made. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:17 am
 There, as Case C 96/09 P Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v Budějovický Budvar, described by the IPKat here, they were unceremoniously tossed back to the General Court for its further attention. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Members of WIN, the Maison de Lanceurs d’Alerte in France, the Whistleblower-Netzwerk e.V. in Germany and Media Defence intervened in the case with third-party comments. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 1:41 am
Therefore if a mark lacks distinctive character in all Member States, the mark can only be registered if it has acquired distinctive character in the whole of the European Union (Lindt & Sprüngli v OHIM, C‑98/11 P, EU:C:2012:307, [61] and [63]).It does not necessarily follow that distinctive character needs to be proven in each Member State. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 3:00 pm by EEM
"Escaping Forced Gang Recruitment: Establishing Eligibility for Asylum after Matter of S-E-G," Hastings Law Journal, vol. 63, no. 5 (2012) [full-text] Note sur la procédure de reconnaissance du droit d’asile: Allemagne, États-Uni, Italie, Pays-Bas, Royaume-Uni, Suède (France, Sénat, mars 2012) [text via Refworld] "Plight of the Boat People: How to Determine State Obligations to Asylum Seekers," Notre Dame Law Review, vol.… [read post]