Search for: "State v. Holland" Results 781 - 800 of 944
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am by INFORRM
As reported by the Inquirer, a state appeals court “upheld the proposition that German privacy laws don’t apply to Facebook, and ruled that the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ULD) for the German state of Schleswig-Holstein has to accept that“. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  (This is also likely to be the case under the fledgling tort of intrusion into seclusion established in C v Holland [2012] NZHC 2155.) [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:26 am by Jeff Gamso
The other day I talked about the decision in Holland v. [read post]