Search for: "State v. Hughes" Results 781 - 800 of 1,945
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2017, 11:32 am by Gene Quinn
Hughes explained that he continues to believe that Versata Development Group, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:59 am by Brian Cordery
She addressed the state of implementation of the Agreement. 12 have ratified so far but not Germany and the UK. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 2:00 am by ASAD KHAN
More significantly, member states would risk breaching of their obligations under the international instruments cited. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Justia’s Verdict blog, Sherry Colb discusses the court’s decision in Moore v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
It is well established that the exemption applies both before and after publication (see Campbell v MGN [2003] QB 633). [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
” Another look at the case comes from Patrick Hughes at Westlaw Journal Intellectual Property. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 4:41 am by Edith Roberts
” Another look at the case comes from Patrick Hughes at Westlaw Journal Intellectual Property. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
BPE Solicitors & Anor v Hughes-Holland (in substitution for Gabriel), heard 14-15 December 2016. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:46 am by ANDREW BODNAR, MATRIX
Analysis On its own this decision once again concludes the arguments about postponement of confiscation proceedings, but it should be read in the light of the decisions in R v Waya [2012] UIKSC 51, R v Ahmad, R v Fields [2014] UKSC 36 and R v Harvey [2015] UKSC 73. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
BPE Solicitors & Anor v Hughes-Holland (in substitution for Gabriel), heard 14-15 December 2016. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
BPE Solicitors & Anor v Hughes-Holland (in substitution for Gabriel), heard 14-15 December 2016. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
And the Court so held in an older case, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]