Search for: "State v. Irish" Results 781 - 800 of 1,158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2012, 2:45 am by Kieran Walsh
  Yet the reluctance by the Irish State to meaningfully address the issue must be assessed in light of the complex political and ethical problems faced by any government attempting to legislate for human rights. [read post]
” The ECtHR in Dudgeon v UK (Application no. 7525/76, Oct. 22, 1981) examined the engagement of Article 8, finding a violation in a Council of Europe member state on the basis of legislation criminalizing sodomy in Northern Ireland. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:34 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
Second, the plaintiffs rely on a different case, Corley v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:47 am by admin
Our friend and colleague Marius Adomnica (Gratl & Company) has written this good case note on the recent Tim Hortons class action case in Ontario: The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released its reasons striking the Plaintiffs’ claim in Fairview Donut Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:44 am by admin
Our friend and colleague Marius Adomnica (Gratl & Company) has written this good case note on the recent Tim Hortons class action case in Ontario: The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released its reasons striking the Plaintiffs’ claim in Fairview Donut Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
v=NsJHqstPuNo     UPDATE: Governor Branstad signed the bill into law. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:57 am
If so, should it be an entirely private entity, or should it be recognised in some way by the State, or should it be a public body? [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:57 am by Adam Wagner
Maintaining this sometimes uneasy balance is the basic task of a democratic state. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 8:45 am by EEM
The Irish Refugee Council has launched the European Database on Asylum Law (EDAL). [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:51 am by TJ McIntyre
Building on earlier Irish authorities and applying the ECtHR decision in Camenzind v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 2:05 am by Fiona de Londras
Related PostsApril 5, 2011 -- A, B & C v Ireland: Update (0)January 10, 2011 -- Irish Women Politicians and Abortion: Hope for change after the ECHR ruling (1) [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 11:29 am by Kluwer Blogger
But by early January, when the instrument had still not been signed, and when rumours were circulating that the text was undergoing review following the decision of the CJEU in the case of Scarlett Extended v SABAM , the plaintiffs in the UPC case issued proceedings against the State citing failure to implement the Directive and seeking redress based on the Frankovich principle. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:25 pm by TJ McIntyre
(Incidentally, it also contradicts the minister's own Programme for Government which states that "The situation can no longer be tolerated where Irish Ministers enact EU legislation by statutory instrument. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:18 pm by Fiona de Londras
Minister Sherlock is engaging extensively on this matter on his twitter page, and argues that the SI simply clarifies the law in light of the decision in EMI v UPC, the difficulty seems to be in terms of clarity and scope. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 10:29 am by TJ McIntyre
The Opinion of the Advocate General in Scarlet (Extended) v. [read post]