Search for: "State v. Irons"
Results 781 - 800
of 2,833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2010, 6:13 am
Thus, to the extent that any state court failed to afford relief for prejudicial error, that oversight would be contrary to both the federal and state standard, and could be dealt with on case by case review.In dissent from the denial of in banc review, Judge Jacobs writes on behalf of Judges Pooler, Lynch and Chin in stating that the Second Circuit needs to iron out these dual ineffective assistance standards. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 8:04 am
It is somewhat ironic that the Supreme Court is confronting the Erie/class action issue in a case where state law is more hostile to class actions than federal law. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 11:28 am
Read more… Despite State Court Order, NJ Federal Court Finds Plaintiff Responsible for Conditional Payments On June 12, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey published its opinion in Taransky v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:58 pm
A leading relevant case, Gerber v Keyes, was decided by a Florida appellate court and New York State ruled in a similar fashion in Wegman v Dairylea Cooperative, Inc. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
On Monday the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
S. 873 (1975), and United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:00 pm
" See Iron Mountain v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:00 pm
" See Iron Mountain v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 10:54 am
In a nutshell, we see the rule first announced in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 4:51 am
The Supreme Court initially interpreted the FLSA in Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad Co. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 12:13 pm
#Ironic. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 5:08 pm
Perell, J. noted that this would run contrary to the principle stated by the Ontario Court of Appeal in Weston Ornamental Iron Works Limted v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 8:46 am
Follow-up: Ars Technica: Seattle utility wants $17,500 refund after failure to scrub negative search results. * State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 5:06 pm
The court resurrected with approval Plessy v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 10:17 pm
Crow Iron Works, 582 S.W.2d 768, 771 (Tex. 1979). [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
[All of the facts in this post come from the 11th Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 2:08 am
In Liqwd, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm
Posted by Jeffrey VlasekDoes anyone remember when Iron Man 3 came out back at the beginning of May? [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 3:52 pm
” West v. [read post]
