Search for: "State v. K. P."
Results 781 - 800
of 1,506
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2012, 9:51 am
Why is there a K between P and D if the offer was made by the store? [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 9:56 am
Dwyer, LLC, and Sean P. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 8:11 pm
Ghahramani, K. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am
Michelle K. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
See International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 68 Welfare Fund v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 2:14 am
Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Davis f/k/a/ Gill v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:42 am
The order specifically stated that the trial court did not rely on Dr. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:31 pm
See In re Farm Raised Salmon Cases, 175 P.3d 1170, 1178 (Cal. 2008); Vermont Pure Holdings, Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 8:26 am
“[T]he language of [section] 1914 itself ... limits standing to challenge state-law terminations of parental right to parents ‘from whose custody such child was removed’ ” (Matter of Adoption of Child of Indian Heritage, 111 N.J. 155, 179, 543 A.2d 925, 937, quoting 25 USC § 1914; see Matter of S.C., 1992 OK 98, ¶ 23, 833 P.2d 1249, 1254, overruled on other grounds Matter of Baby Boy L., 2004 OK 93, 103 P.3d 1099). [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
Patent System, and Why They Matter Today, Robert P. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
Available at: http://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol92/iss2/12 Madden v Midland involved debt that was not only in delinquent, but already charged off by the original creditor (FIA Card Services p/k/a Bank of America, N.A.). [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
Available at: http://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol92/iss2/12 Madden v Midland involved debt that was not only in delinquent, but already charged off by the original creditor (FIA Card Services p/k/a Bank of America, N.A.). [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 11:01 am
On the other hand, “a disclaimer should not remove more than is necessary […] to restore novelty […]” (see G 1/03 [headnote 2.2] and [3]).[5.5.1] The second paragraph of G 1/03 [3] states“However, the only justification for the disclaimer is to exclude a novelty-destroying disclosure […]. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 11:00 am
CiteID=461834Appeal from the District Court of Laramie County, the Honorable Michael K. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 8:25 am
The District Court agreed and dismissed Count One, and the Eleventh Circuit affirmed in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
In a seminal 1977 discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
The second Ordinance seeks to amend the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act passed by Parliament earlier this year to carve out India’s 29th State- Telangana from the erstwhile undivided State of Andhra Pradesh.[2] This Ordinance makes certain amendments to the territories covered by the Khammam district under this State bifurcation law. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
Michelle K. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Edward K. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:30 pm
7 (2010) (Reines.2010) Gregory P. [read post]
