Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 781 - 800
of 4,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2018, 9:14 am
In particular, treaty obligations cease to apply to a territory where it secedes from the state which entered into the treaty, or for example where a formerly dependent territory becomes independent from the parent state which entered into the treaty. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:01 am
Expanding on the Supreme Court’s decision on the first argument, Lord Clarke stated that the only question is whether the maps were drawn to a scale of not less than 1:25,000 and held that they were. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:21 am
Lord Justice Aiken, delivering the unanimous verdict of the Court, which included Lord Justice Longmore who delivered the leading judgment in AP (Trinidad & Tobago) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 551, dismissed the appeal. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 6:31 am
Lord v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:02 am
Mr Hoskins QC states that it does. 14:37: Lord Briggs questions whether there may be cases where equality is equity and that equality of distribution is fair. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 2:00 am
The Seller relied on The Golden Victory (Golden Strait Corporation v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:05 am
Last week, federal district courts in three states handed down decisions in cases in which a former employee was suing his or her employer for refusing to provide them with a religious exemption from the employer's Covid vaccine mandate.In Crocker v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 3:35 am
Lord Neuberger stated that the FOIA 2000, s 53, does not permit the Attorney General to override the decision of a judicial tribunal or Court by issuing a certificate merely because he, considering the same facts and arguments, takes a different view from that taken by the tribunal or Court. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:29 am
The Moore Opinion also states that the true and fair view is of an overarching nature. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 2:26 am
Lord Neuberger stated that the conclusion of the Court of Appeal in Ellis v Rowbotham [1900] 1 QB 740 that the 1870 Act did not apply to rent payable in advance, is correct. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:13 am
Lords Phillips and Clarke find that the claim falls within the scope of the State Immunity Act 1978, s 3(1)(a). [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am
On 19 May 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:17 am
The Secretary of State refused to allow this. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 3:00 am
In giving the lead judgment, Lord Sumption stated that s 12A of the Theft Act imposes strict liability only to the extent that anyone who was party to the taking of the vehicle (and in the immediate vicinity at the time of the injury) commits the offence, whether or not he was driving at the time. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 3:41 am
Comparison with Holland v HM Advocate [2005] UKPC D 1 does not assist, as the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council was performing a different exercise and its decision reflected the particular circumstances of that appeal. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 11:23 am
United States, 489 U.S. 705 (1989).United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:07 am
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 (12 October 2011) When you breathed in asbestos fibres from your dusty shipbuilding job on the River Clyde in the 1950s and 1960s, some of those fibres stuck around in the lungs. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:29 am
Giving the majority judgment Lord Clarke stated that S & Marper was concerned only with the position of suspected but non-convicted persons, not convicted persons. [read post]
