Search for: "State v. Love" Results 781 - 800 of 8,995
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Those tasked with probating a will at the death of a loved one should seek legal counsel to initiate the process. [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:58 am by Becky
ESRT Empire State Building, L.L.C. has filed a figurative application for an image of the Empire State Building (see below) covering, among other things “non-fungible tokens (NFTs)” and “downloadable multimedia files containing artwork authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs)” in Class 9 (see here).The sheer number of ‘Metaverse-related’ filings already present on the register indicates that brands are determined to secure their protection… [read post]
1 May 2022, 1:45 am by Frank Cranmer
In LF v SCRL [2022] EUECJ C‑344/20 (Opinion), Advocate General Medina suggests at [60] that “Article 8 of Directive 2000/78 must be interpreted as permitting Member States to adopt … autonomous protection as a means legitimately to determine, first, whether employees concerned by religious clothing obligations should not be placed, as a matter of principle, in a situation where they might need to choose between observing the obligations deriving… [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
I'd love to hear any suggestions people might have; I still have a few weeks to edit it before it's put to bed. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 8:54 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  (Weirdly, people who criticize academia love the word ensconce.) [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 7:28 am by Antti Ruokonen
When contemporary advocates in the Ukraine context talk about Finlandization, it conjures images of a benevolent form of Swiss-like neutrality chosen by peace-loving Northern Europeans who opted out of the Cold War. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 7:09 am by John Elwood
To begin with, one familiar nine-time relist is leaving us: Love v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 6:15 am by Don Asher
Am J Ind Med. 1998 Oct;34(4):351-8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199810)34:4<351::aid-ajim8>3.0.co;2-v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 3:09 am by SHG
” During the voir dire proceeding that followed, both Love and the State questioned the prospective juror about his response to question No. 69. [read post]