Search for: "State v. Peoples"
Results 781 - 800
of 44,965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2014, 1:27 pm
In the Criminal Court complaint, a paralegal with the Kings County District Attorney's Office states that she is informed by Police Officer KK that on or about 19 April 2009, at 7:32 P.M. at 390 Nostrand Avenue, County of Kings, City and State of New York, defendant was in possession of crack cocaine. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:58 am
In AT&T v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:05 pm
The United States Supreme Court sent shock waves to the criminal defense community with their decision in Carpenter V. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 2:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:30 am
Today’s appeal, R (on the application of Paul Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, asks whether the Health Act 2006 applies by necessary implication to a prison administered by the Crown. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 11:43 am
Mabry v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 12:08 pm
Here's a crime that doesn't fill up a plethora of pages in the California Appellate Reports: a state criminal prosecution of the owner of twelve Subway restaurants for underpaying state sales tax revenue.Notwithstanding the prosecution, white collar criminals everywhere should be happy at the underlying events. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:10 am
Would your analysis be altered given the classic exposition of the Ex Post Facto Clause in Calder v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 12:44 pm
Boyd v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 8:20 am
In State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 8:06 pm
The States and the People; Popular Referenda --K.K. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 2:37 pm
In the Landmark cases -- known as People v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 2:28 pm
As well as remind me of the scene in "Superbad" in which the officers tell "McLovin": "A lot of people have weird names lately . . . [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 3:00 pm
The Fourteenth Amendment just implies (at most) that states can take away the right of felons to vote, not that it should (and certainly not that it must). [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 1:16 pm
”The Illinois Supreme Court in the case People v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 2:58 pm
Erskine will almost certainly not in fact be executed by the state. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:03 pm
Justice Corrigan authors a powerful opinion that holds that it's not permissible for the police to conduct a Terry stop just because someone's in a high crime area and pretending to tie his shoe behind a car in order to avoid the police, and Justice Evan authors an equally powerful concurrence (joined by a majority of the Court) that highlights the racial implications of a rule that assumes that the "normal" response to a police encounter is to welcome and/or consent to… [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 4:35 am
That strategy shifted, however, in 2019 when abortion opponents began to hope the Supreme Court would use a near-total ban to overturn Roe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:23 am
Justice Samuel Alito’s dissent from a denial of certiorari in Storman’s Inc. v. [read post]
