Search for: "State v. Rose" Results 781 - 800 of 2,317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2017, 6:45 am by Derek T. Muller
Good news from the California bar: the overall bar pass rate rose year-over-year from 43% to 49.6%. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 1:19 pm by Andrew Hamm
Ginsburg borrowed from her dissent in Shelby County v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
These private citizens and citizens' groups include Michigan Decency Action Council, Inc., Judy Rose, Dar Vander Ark, and Black Hills Citizens for a Better Community (collectively "Non-City Defendants-Appellees"). [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:15 pm by Andrew Koppelman
SullivanMary–Rose PapandreaChapter 9The Story of Pickering v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 8:24 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  He noted that average premia nationwide rose at a rate of 12 percent from 2021 to 2022 (the year in which my premium rose by 34.9 percent). [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 12:52 pm by Max Weirauch
Partner Steve Cikes also has extensive appellate experience, helping to secure victories in cases involving vested rights (Rose v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm by Amy Howe
Rose is a straightforward one:  certiorari should be denied. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 7:12 am by Giorgio Luceri
Here they are in case you missed them:TRADE MARKSKatfriend Marijus Dingilevskis posted on a recent decision of the Lithuanian Supreme Court, which states that even if a trade mark has been registered in the international register for 40 years, this is no guarantee that a subsequent national designation will be also registered.GuestKat Becky Knott commented on the decision of the 2nd Board of Appeal in case R 609/2021-2 [Volkswagen… [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:02 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
GuestKat Rose Hughes commented on the recent statement issued by the PEB in this regard. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:21 am by Adam Chandler
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Gail Markels and George Rose contend that California’s law restricting the sale of such games to minors is, at a practical level, unnecessary because it “empower[s] state bureaucrats to do what parents and retailers are already doing at no cost to taxpayers. [read post]