Search for: "State v. South" Results 781 - 800 of 11,012
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2021, 7:06 am by Pete Strom
  STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA COUNTY COUNCIL FOR RICHLAND COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:19 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
We agree that the circuit court lacked jurisdiction over the parcels held in trust by the United States and affirm. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
The Attorney General objected to the plan on the ground that the second district could have been created to give effect to minority voting strength in the State’s south-central to southeastern region. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 1:43 pm by Dan Flynn
A tentative date of June 2017 has been set for the start of the jury trial in a South Dakota state court over the “pink slime” dispute known as BPI v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 1:33 pm by Brian A. Comer
Ford appealed and the South Carolina Court of Appeals reversed in Riley v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Anna Price
Mockus for committing blasphemy during his lectures in State v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Christopher Brown, Matrix
On 25 February 2015, the Supreme Court handed down its judgments in R (oao Rotherham Metropolitan BC and Ors) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 6. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 4:24 pm
The United States needs new refineries, but... [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 11:44 am by Kevin Russell
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral argument in Maracich v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
In addition to Bill Marler, the top food safety attorney in the United States, court documents show Spoor’s team has enlisted these experts: Professor David Coetzee of the Division of Public Health Medicine at the School of Public Health and Family Medicine at the University of Cape Town, South Africa. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 6:21 am by Kalvis Golde
Five years ago, a divided Supreme Court held in South Dakota v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:28 am by Adam Thimmesch
By now, anyone who reads this post should be aware that the Supreme Court decided South Dakota v. [read post]