Search for: "State v. Sparks"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2017, 3:00 pm
Claiborne Hardware and New York Times v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm
Creative spark is required, but there is no additional threshold of capacity. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 6:06 pm
In Webster v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 5:09 am
Corp. v Insurance Co. of N. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
During the oral argument in Shelby County v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:22 am
Ass’n v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
The Feres doctrine, stemming from the 1950 Feres v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 9:15 am
Any "creative spark" counts, "no matter how crude [or] humble." [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 10:41 am
Fountain v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 6:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 4:18 am
”To bolster its conclusion that questions 2-4 were unconstitutional, Justice Livingston's opinion cited the Supreme Court case of Minnesota v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 10:05 am
The case is Miller v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 9:00 am
More information about the case can be found under the name Beef Products Inc et al v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 6:33 am
The potential roadblocks -- her involvement in the controversial Ricci v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 3:00 am
Supreme Court held in Miller v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 6:39 pm
And it was heartening to see Supreme Court decisions such as Kimbrough v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 12:05 pm
The series of events sparked widespread outrage among youth activists, lawyers, parliamentarians and other stakeholders of the country and has since birthed at least two petitions to the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice, an independent state institution, to carry out investigations into the abuse of the rights of these protesters. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 9:51 am
He supports his argument with reference to the case of Opremreh v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:33 am
Does Article 27 of the TRIPS Agreement setting out the framework for patent protection fall within a field for which the Member States continue to have primary competence and, if so, can the Member States themselves accord direct effect to that provision, and can the national court apply it directly subject to the requirements laid down by national law? [read post]
6 May 2014, 7:56 am
In a case called Gay Law Students Association v. [read post]
