Search for: "State v. Stallings"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,022
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 5:33 am
” In Vaughn v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 1:36 am
Supreme Court decided, in Wyeth v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
In LICRA v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Shelby County v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 12:48 pm
., a student who was born with cerebral palsy and whose mobility is impaired, was the catalyst for the first oral argument of the day, in Fry v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
In its now infamous decision, Boub v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:59 am
The United States Supreme Court weighed in on the issue in Gentile v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:26 am
Supreme Court in Dusky v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 6:50 am
Matt pointed out on Tuesday that plans to close Guantanamo are reportedly stalled. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:17 am
Zinke, … their important amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 2:01 am
" While the Ohio bill stalled in committee. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:06 pm
Backstory: SJ Properties Suites v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 1:32 pm
” State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 8:19 am
” State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 10:00 am
V. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 10:00 am
V. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 6:35 am
I'll just state these as rhetorical questions. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:57 pm
As a result, on May 27, 2020, the Secretary of State announced that the PRC had fundamentally undermined Hong Kong’s autonomy and certified and reported to the Congress, pursuant to sections 205 and 301 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, as amended, respectively, that Hong Kong no longer warrants treatment under United States law in the same manner as United States laws were applied to Hong Kong before July 1, 1997. [read post]
