Search for: "State v. Starks"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,629
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2022, 11:33 am
The court’s decision marks a stark departure from almost two decades of what Massachusetts employers had understood to be settled law under the state’s Wage Act. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 8:47 am
Much about Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
All the while Maya v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 4:50 am
In Oxford Health Plans LLC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:03 pm
., the Court will hear a state case, Riley v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
Last month the Supreme Court delivered judgment in AP v DPP [2011] IESC 2, which concerned an appeal against the High Court’s refusal to grant an order prohibiting a fourth trial of the applicant. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
Mr Stark also considered that there might be circumstances in which a third party could be cross-examined by the applicant or the applicant's representative. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
Mr Stark also considered that there might be circumstances in which a third party could be cross-examined by the applicant or the applicant's representative. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 1:27 pm
In today’s case (Provost v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 10:52 am
However, in Hernandez v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:52 am
It states, ‘the reports will use [the Claimant’s] case as a stark illustration of these issues‘. [read post]
15 May 2008, 9:58 am
Starks Mechanical, Inc. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 11:35 am
Township of Scott, which overturned the court’s precedent on the issue of eminent domain in the state law context in Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Co. v Maryland Cas. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 7:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 8:42 am
Stark and David Greenwald. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 3:08 pm
In Quinn Estate v. [read post]
