Search for: "State v. Word" Results 781 - 800 of 40,617
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2010, 5:38 am by Deborah Pearlstein
Consider, for example, how heavily today’s decision rested on the analysis in the Supreme Court’s 1950 decision in Johnson v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
I'll say a few more words about the case as well as state sovereign immunity more broadly.The Constitution contains no express provision granting state governments sovereign immunity. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 6:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
Three weeks ago, CAAF granted review in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:58 pm by Zachary Spilman
Judge Stucky, writing for a unanimous court in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 pm by Ilya Somin
Chief Justice Roberts' opinion notes that ordinarily the Supreme Court defers to state supreme courts as having the last word on questions involving the meaning of state law as was held in Murdock v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 9:08 pm
In the words of Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect 'a wall of separation between Church and State.' Reynolds v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 5:00 am by INFORRM
There is no problem with the aim pursed by the measure at stake, i.e. the imposition of liability, as in the words of the ECtHR protecting the rights of others is a legitimate aim. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:59 am by Albert Wan
True to her word, Judge Gottschall from the Northern District of Illinois has issued a follow up opinion in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 9:43 pm
You can download the full text of Johnson here in pdf or MS Word format. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 6:17 pm
Analysis: Whether the debtor’s additional State tax liability can be discharged turns on the meaning of the words “or equivalent report or notice” added to 11 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:04 am by Eugene Volokh
I take it that the concurrence is urging the legislature to criminalize face-to-face insults that are likely to cause a fight, which fit within the First Amendment "fighting words" exception; for more on the special question of whether the fighting words exception should be applied to speech said to police officers, see State v. [read post]