Search for: "Strickland v. State"
Results 781 - 800
of 918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 12:28 pm
United States, 17-8, and a citizen’s group, in Upstate Citizens for Equality v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 2:54 pm
Lara v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm
United States and Lee v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 7:09 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 8:29 am
Texas, 18-9674Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 11:33 am
Experimental Psychol., Learning, Memory & Cognition, 378 (2011). [4] Strickland v. [read post]
13 May 2023, 7:59 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 1:19 am
It examines the federal and state constitutionality issuesthat surround the subject, and includes state-by-state graphics of the statutes covering lifewithout parole for children.
Domestic Violence: When the "Perp" Is a CopThe Ultimate Power and Control By Richard A. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 10:11 pm
See State v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 7:19 am
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:32 pm
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit reversed, stating that the U.S. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 8:28 pm
State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 10:22 am
State-on-top habeas case Woods v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:54 am
ColsonDocket: 11-981Issue(s): Whether the prejudice arising from multiple errors committed by defense counsel should be considered cumulatively for purposes of deciding whether counsel rendered ineffective assistance under Strickland v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am
Texas, 18-9674Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
Shaw, 13-897, a state-on-top habeas case that asked whether, in an ineffective assistance claim, “a state appellate court’s holding that an omitted state law issue ultimately lacked merit precludes a federal habeas court from later finding either deficient performance or prejudice” under Strickland v. [read post]
