Search for: "Sullivan v. Sullivan*" Results 781 - 800 of 4,158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Town Attorney had concluded that Town Law §81 did not permit a referendum concerning term limits.Finding that there was no statutory basis for a public referendum on this particular issue, the Appellate Division ruled that Plaintiffs' petition failed to adequately allege a clear legal right to the relief Plaintiffs sought and sustained the Supreme Court's granting the Respondents' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' petition for failure to state a cause of actionThe Appellate… [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:11 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied a petition for rehearing en banc in CREW v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
We also agree with the Supreme Court’s determination denying that branch of the defendant’s motion which was based upon CPLR 3211(a)(3) to dismiss the fourth cause of action insofar as asserted against the defendant for lack of standing (see General Obligations Law § 13-101; Greevy v Becker, Isserlis, Sullivan & Kurtz, 240 AD2d 539, 541). [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 8:14 am by Rob Robinson
Editor’s Note: These are the results of the fifth semi-annual Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Survey conducted by ComplexDiscovery. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:20 am by Daily Record Staff
Real property — Foreclosure — Need for a hearing In June 2016, appellees, acting as substitute trustees, filed an Order to Docket in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, seeking to foreclose on real property owned by Flavia Makundi, appellant. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 7:58 am by Thomas Baer
”Law Journal PressTo locate antitrust titles in Law Journal Press, choose “Antitrust” from the “Practice Area” dropdown menu.Antitrust Basics by Thomas V. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 12:02 pm by NCC Staff
Mazars Is a Victory for Rule of Law By Quinta Jurecic, Managing Editor, Lawfare Quinta Jurecic writes that the Supreme Court’s decision in Mazars v. [read post]