Search for: "Sweet v. State"
Results 781 - 800
of 910
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
" (Hugh Hall Campbell, KC v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:21 am
See United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
(Sierra Club, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm
The event will feature panels on official accountability—including an appearance from one of the plaintiffs in Monroe v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 12:44 am
V. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:27 pm
Walling v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:22 am
By Nicole KilloranOCS/Pappas v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 9:52 am
State v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:12 am
Case: Parker v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
On political cycles: Here, with apologies to Plato and Polybius, is a short and sweet version of the ancient Greek conception of the regime cycle. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:26 am
In particular the EPO states that "after the section referring to the relevant prior art, it is helpful to state... [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 9:45 am
Hale ; associate editors, Gail V. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:16 pm
In other words: evidence of lies in the proceedings, a costs order must be made.Justice Boland stated the approach to be taken on costs:The relevant provisions of the Act are s 117, s 117AB and s 117C. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 3:28 pm
That’s Washington v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 1:56 pm
Sweet - new business. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 12:19 pm
Rivera v. [read post]
