Search for: "TAYLOR v. STATE" Results 781 - 800 of 3,087
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2008, 9:01 pm
Louisiana (07-343), involving the constitutionality of imposing the death penalty for child rape, and Taylor v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:31 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: In the recently decided United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 11:59 am
Taylor, 401 S.C. 104, 108, 736 S.E.2d 663, 663 (South Carolina Supreme Court 2013).State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 11:03 am
This is not a case where the state judges were confused about the law or overlooked key evidence, as in Taylor v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 12:05 pm
Random drug testing of teachersSource: National Law Journal ArticleEducators are challenging new policies being adopted by school districts requiring them to submit to random drug tests for illegal drugs.Pending cases include Jones v Graham County [North Carolina] Board of Education [COA 08-477]; American Federation of Teachers v Kanawah County [West Virginia] Board of Education [08-Misc 421]; and Hawaii State Teachers Association and Hawaii Labor Relations Board… [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:49 am
”* In contrast, in Kidwell v Transportation Communications Union, 946 F.2d. 283, the Circuit Court held that a union member employed in an agency shop does not have any right to object to his or her union's using part of a member's dues for activities unrelated to collective negotiations. ** Chapter 338 of the Laws of 2008 made the agency shop fee provisions for public employees setout in the Taylor Law [Civil Service Law Article 14] permanent for State… [read post]
18 May 2022, 2:07 pm by NARF
Taylor (Tribal Courts; Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act) Weiss v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 8:39 am by Howard Friedman
Governor of State of Washington, (9th Cir., May 22, 2013), the 9th Circuit dismissed under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine an inmate's claim that state court judges violated his free exercise rights by refusing to transfer his case to an ecclesiastical tribunal.In Phillips v. [read post]