Search for: "Tenant v. State"
Results 781 - 800
of 3,335
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2007, 12:24 am
United States
Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
18 May 2018, 12:41 pm
Smith v Khan (2018) EWCA Civ 1137 Well! [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 1:40 pm
Supreme Court had ruled in June under Alabama Association of Realtors v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 4:52 am
District Court for the Southern District of California's latest opinion in Qualcomm Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 2:34 am
District Court for the Southern District of California's latest opinion in Qualcomm Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 5:25 am
LLC, v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 3:28 pm
Part V of this Article will analyze evictions in North Dakota. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 6:19 am
In the very recent case of Yankey v Austin (2020) LPELR-49540(CA) the Nigerian Court of Appeal was faced with the issue of whether a court in the United State has jurisdiction to make an order affecting immovable property in Lagos, Nigeria. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 2:49 pm
The Council, to stop his return prior to the hearing of the possession claim, offered a flat to the tenant on the basis of a detailed licence stating that he would not become a secure tenant of the flat and that the tenancy of the flat would cease on determination of the possession claim against the original property. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 5:37 pm
A group of the existing tenants led by the Defendants have sought to persuade other tenants to take steps in order to enfranchise the block. [read post]
4 May 2016, 10:49 pm
If you want a brief example of the court’s approach to these issues look no further than the case of Manchester City Council v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 6:36 pm
The ruling in Chrysafis v. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:34 am
" Mota v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 4:00 am
Sunset Estate Properties, L.L.C. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 5:12 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:15 am
The rate should have been 7 percent.But, of course, the State should have argued this below. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 2:51 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 10:18 pm
S. 133, 136 (1955); see United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 10:58 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:10 am
” It is well established that where it is possible for works to be done at no cost to a tenant (e.g. under a guarantee), to carry out the works at a cost to the tenant will render that cost unreasonable, unless there is some evidence from the landlord of some disadvantage or good reason to reject the availability of works without cost in favour of incurring a cost (see Continental Property Ventures v White [2007] L&TR 4, cited in F Davey & J… [read post]
