Search for: "The People v. Johnson" Results 781 - 800 of 2,498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2014, 9:06 am by Ritika Singh
Matt Danzer pored through the transcripts of yesterday’s military commissions motions hearing in U.S. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Johnson pardoned him “for all offences…committed, arising from participation, direct or implied, in the said Rebellion. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
Lucy, an African American graduate student, enrolled at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, pursuant to a court order in the case of Lucy v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 3:31 pm by Stuart Levine
Johnson, 19 S.W.3d 831 (Tenn.Ct.App. 1999). [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:45 am
Supreme Court's decision in Buckeye Check Cashing v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 4:46 am by Alfred Brophy
 Here I'm thinking about cases like United Daughters of the Confederacy v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 5:31 pm by LundgrenJohnson
  Its preamble states: So what did the law change in practical terms and how does it impact the defenses of people accused of DWI? [read post]