Search for: "Thomas Roe"
Results 781 - 800
of 811
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am
Charter Fishing Trip“To Have and Have Not” (Warner Bros. 1944) The National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) published a rule requiring owner and operators of for-hire vessel operating in the Gulf of Mexico to (1) install GPS devices that constantly archived the vessel’s locations, and (2) allow federal fisheries enforcement personnel access to the information. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:24 am
Thomas-Greenfield said at a U.N. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:21 am
Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh dissented, and would have granted the injunction. [read post]
8 May 2008, 7:48 am
If a liberal legal academic cannot say publicly (if she believes it to be so) that Roe v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 5:56 am
Thomas Brennan. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm
In earlier posts, such as this one, I noted that in the context of commercial activities, the Supreme Court—and virtually every other court, for that matter—has consistently construed the Free Exercise Clause and religious accommodation statutes not to require religious exemptions from generally applicable regulations, from at least 1944 until this week. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
Additionally, Pryor has called Roe v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling that struck down Roe v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:46 am
In a concurring opinion, Breyer agreed with Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas that the monument should be allowed to remain. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
I'm putting up some excerpts from my new draft article, The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, hoping to get some feedback. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
More than a quarter century after passing it, Congress has repealed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
App. 5th 141, 148-49 (2020) (suicide); Roe v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:36 am
Whatever the goals of backers, Measure 26 is not a frontal assault on Roe v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm
Two justices – Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito – indicated that they would have denied the requests by the FDA and Danco, which manufactures mifepristone and joined the case to defend the drug. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:34 am
Sometime before commencement of the Supreme Court’s 2009 term, Mike Sacks, a third-year law student at Georgetown University, had an idea. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:36 pm
For all the talk of "modesty" and "restraint," the right wing Justices of the Court have a striking record of ignoring precedent, overturning congressional statutes, limiting constitutional protections, and discovering new constitutional rights: the infamous Ledbetter decision, for instance; the Louisville and Seattle integration cases, for example; the first limitation on Roe v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:05 am
(Editor’s Note: This essay was written by Robert Monks and Harvard Law School Visiting Professor Peter Murray.) [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm
Scholars of the Supreme Court have pointed out that the current Court is an anomaly in American history in being composed entirely of members who came to the Court after service (some of it relatively brief - as to which see Clarence Thomas and John Roberts) on the U.S. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am
Surveillance Privacy advocates are worried about the use of surveillance technology to track women seeking abortions in US states that have banned and restricted the procedure following the Supreme Court decision which overturned Roe v Wade. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:32 am
Senatorial brinksmanship is symptomatic of a problem that began long before Kavanaugh, Garland, Clarence Thomas or Bork: the courts’ aiding and abetting the expansion of federal power, and then shifting that power away from the people’s representatives and toward the executive branch. [read post]
