Search for: "Thomas v. King" Results 781 - 800 of 873
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2009, 4:30 pm by Mark Beese
Durham, Chief Marketing and Business Development Officer, McGuireWoods LLP Katherine D'Urso, Chief Marketing Officer, King & Spalding Mark C. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 7:18 am
Florida and Graham v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 11:03 pm
    King Duncan:       Is execution done on Cawdor? [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:13 am
King et al. which put a decision on hold until the Supreme Court makes a determination in three similar cases: National Rifle Association v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Waltham, MA; Brad Sampson, President) Bagel Kings Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(North Chelmsford, MA; Thomas Rosedale, President) America Floors Inc. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
Tafas v Doll (Patent Docs) US: For stem cells, it seems that conception is enough: University of Pittsburgh v Hedrick (Patent Docs) (Patents4Life) US: General Accountability Office report on Bayh-Dole: Leverage to promote commercialisation of federally-funded inventions (PatentBIOtech) US: AlphaVax seeks review of BPAI decision awarding priority of invention to Novartis in interference between patents related to Alphavirus (Patent Docs) US: Teva, Taro lobby US legislators on… [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 2:00 pm by Andrew Raff
" Adam Bonin at Daily Kos, nicely summarizes the key points of the opinion and various dissenting and concurring opinions, SCOTUS Issues "F**king Brilliant" Decision Previously: FCC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 10:01 pm
Recently, Isiah Thomas was hired as a coach for Florida International University. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 4:42 am
  This month's The Court of Appeals decision  in Amilfatano v, Rosenberg will likely boost litigator's awareness of the statute. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:35 am
Instead, as the Amalfitanos point out, section 487 descends from the first Statute of Westminster, which was adopted by the Parliament summoned by King Edward I of England in 1275.The relevant provision of that statute specified that "if any Serjeant, Pleader, or other, do any manner of Deceit or Collusion in the King's Court, or consent [unto it,] in deceit of the Court [or] to beguile the Court, or the Party, and thereof be attainted, he shall be imprisoned for a Year… [read post]