Search for: "U.S. Direct Express"
Results 781 - 800
of 9,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2020, 5:01 pm
The India Express noted "By calling it “directed” and “pulsed” energy, the report leaves no room for confusion that the victims’ exposure was targeted and not due to common sources of microwave energy, such as, a mobile phone. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 6:01 am
The plaintiffs allege: The U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 3:56 pm
On July 6, the U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:01 am
Additionally, the IRGC was already sanctioned under IEEPA, and the U.S. military expressed concern that such a designation would encourage the IRGC to increase its targeting of U.S. personnel and interests in the Middle East. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 11:54 am
-based insurers authorized for the express purpose of writing only surplus lines insurance. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 12:53 pm
U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:09 am
(In early 2010, Matt Waxman and I directed a task force for the Council on Foreign Relations that examined the challenges for the U.S. delegation that resulted in a Council Study Report written by Vijay Padmanabhan.) [read post]
29 May 2015, 5:57 am
U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:16 am
-Taiwan relations, and directed that the guidelines be communicated to Taiwan and to the U.S. [read post]
30 May 2024, 9:57 am
Barnette, the Supreme Court invalidated a requirement that schoolchildren salute the U.S. flag and recite the Pledge of Allegiance. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:38 am
This information is available on the CDC's U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:51 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:14 pm
XCitement Video, Inc., 513 U.S. 64, 73 (1994). [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 11:40 am
The U.S. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 5:10 am
U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 12:33 pm
EFF’s brief argues that the order issued by the British Columbia court violates both international free expression principles and the First Amendment of the U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 8:32 am
On April 15, 2013 the U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 9:18 am
To learn more about what is protected by a patent visit the U.S. [read post]
29 May 2015, 8:35 am
O'Neil, 324 U.S. 697, 704 (1945); See also American Express v. [read post]
