Search for: "U.S. v. French"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2016, 6:33 am
Baze v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:12 am
Emma pens of the story about Twitter and its attempts to register a trade mark for…"dronie".* The U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 9:16 am
On March 6, Dred Scott v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Specialty Software Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Andrews, Delegating Religious Liberty: The Executive's Role in Accommodating Religion, (February 1, 2016).From SSRN (Non-U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 8:06 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:20 pm
” A top U.S. general in Iraq said that, either way, those brigades could require U.S. support. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:34 pm
The French National Assembly voted to extend France’s State of Emergency for three months. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
., Culture in the Domains of Law (Cambridge University Press), Forthcoming).From SSRN (Non-U.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:30 am
I saw no reason to drag the U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:31 am
Gigliotti, 2015 U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
Attorney, U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 3:07 am
Guantanamera Cigars Co., 102 USPQ2d 1085, 1097 (TTAB 2012).The Board found nothing in the record from which to determine "whether (1) U.S. customers who do not speak French would recognize 'aux Etats Unis' as referring to 'in the United States' or 'to the United States,' or (ii) U.S. consumers who speak French are a substantial portion of the relevant consuming public, and would be deceived by the asserted misrepresentation in… [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 10:37 am
Supreme Court in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 10:13 am
Katz v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
City of Boise, 15-493 (whether the Idaho Supreme Court correctly concluded that the U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:12 pm
Bushrod is known for, among other things, deciding Corfield v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 7:17 am
“We don’t want to be a digital colony of the U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Wright, After Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
https://t.co/aZq03eBYJm -> Statutory damages for copyright infringement of 20k per wok infringed awarded RE/MAX v. [read post]