Search for: "U.S. v. Parks" Results 781 - 800 of 4,772
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 3:30 pm by Comunicaciones_MJ
Parks, 494 U.S. 484, 495 (1990) Prohíbe el castigo de ciertas acusados por su clase. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 9:46 pm by David Super
U.S. substantially reduced the stakes in the next federal government shutdown. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Riley is suing Laura Murray over a tweet posted a short time after the former Labour leader was hit by eggs thrown by a Brexit supporter during a visit to Finsbury Park mosque on 3 March 2019. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 2:46 am by Orin S. Kerr
One of the fascinating questions raised by the United States Supreme Court's 2018 decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 10:38 am by Eric A. Posner
The case is all the more striking because more than a century ago, in Jacobson v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 1:28 pm by editor
Search Warrants If a company is the subject of a search warrant, you’ll know when dozens of armed agents wearing various colored windbreakers and layers of body armor quickly exit vans and SUVs in your parking lot and flood into your building just as it opens for business. [read post]