Search for: "U.S. v. U.S. Currency" Results 781 - 800 of 889
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2023, 5:01 am by Richard Re
Before 303 Creative, it appeared widely agreed in U.S. legal culture that the imagined person could sue at once. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:01 am
Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (2009-2011), on Tuesday, March 27, 2018 Tags: Banks, Deregulation, Dodd-Frank Act, Financial crisis, Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Foreign banks, Leverage, Prudence, S. 2155, Systemic risk, Too big to fail, US Senate Upcoming Volcker Rule Regulatory Changes Posted by Mark V. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 7:20 am by Guest Author
”  The Court stressed a theme that would re-gain currency more than 70 years later in Loper Bright Enter. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Phillips Issue: Whether a prison librarian can face personal liability under 42 U.S.C. 1983 for preventing an inmate from using a comb-binding machine to file a petition for certiorari at the U.S. [read post]
8 May 2019, 10:30 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Huang, Empirical Analysis of Australian Trademark Infringement Decisions: Implications for the U.S. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm by renholding
From 1998 to 2007, the assets of the five largest U.S. banks grew from $2.2 trillion to $6.8 trillion.8 As the scope of financial institutions’ activities grew under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, banking regulators were limited in their ability to directly examine or require reports from subsidiaries regulated by other agencies.9 These policies made it difficult for any single regulator to see the entirety of a financial firm’s activities. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 3:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Access is currency on K Street, and the subtleties of in-person relationship-building can be at least as important as crafting a policy message. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:22 pm by Submitted Post
They are silent as to legal responsibilities of the parties for export clearance, import clearance, payment of import duties, purchase of cargo insurance and the nuances of pre-carriage obligations (e.g. truck-to-air terminal in the exporter’s country) and main carriage (e.g. air carrier-to-named destination in the U.S.). [read post]