Search for: "UNITED STATES ARMY"
Results 781 - 800
of 8,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2008, 2:32 am
Ken Salazar asked Army Secretary Pete Geren to investigate the slayings. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 7:10 am
They issued just one opinion in an argued case: United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 7:57 am
Environmental Protection Agency have regulated the discharge of pollutants into the waters of the United States under 33 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 7:32 am
Judge Advocates are stationed in the United States and abroad. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 2:33 pm
United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 5:46 am
According to a report in the NY Times today, military contractors (mercenaries) hired by the United States are returning "home with the same kinds of combat-related mental health problems that afflict United States military personnel. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 5:38 pm
See United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 8:12 am
Duty locations include the continental United States and overseas installations around the world. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the United States Army have almost certainly been buying questionable remote access hacking tools for years from an Italian company called Hacking Team, via an obscure American reseller called Cicom USA. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:44 am
-supported Free Syrian Army and similar factions, not on the Islamic State. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 9:23 pm
United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 3:20 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
United States (1939) 308 U.S. 271, and United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 2:51 pm
" United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 7:33 am
In a published opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 1:18 pm
In United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 10:34 am
The Army Court of Criminal Appeals will hear oral argument on Wednesday, August 3, 2016, at 10 a.m., in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:01 pm
” United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:01 am
United States Corps of Engineers (D.S.D.): 90-sisseton-brief us-army-corps-brief 92-sisseton-reply 93-dct-order An excerpt: For the reasons explained above, the Court denies Plaintiffs’ request for an injunction against the Corps, remands to the Corps for reconsideration whether the 2009 gully crossings were the type of undertaking that could affect historic properties under 36 C.F.R. [read post]
