Search for: "Under Seal 1 v. United States"
Results 781 - 800
of 850
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(The IP Factor) Uganda Anti-counterfeits conference held in Kampala (Afro-IP) United Kingdom IP rights in the Court of Appeal, but not as we know them...: Office of Communications v Information Commissioner (IPKat) IPO review of practice before Patent Tribunal (PatLit) Employee inventor compensation: an expensive pastime? [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:18 am
Compare United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 7:33 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:34 pm
(United States Liab. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 9:33 am
Flower, No. 1 CA-CV 06-0781 (Ariz. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 1:48 pm
See United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 12:41 pm
White, Supreme Court of Illinois, No. 107816 (01/09/2009)"Because the Secretary of State had no duty under section 5(1) of the Secretary of State Act (15 ILCS 305/5(1) (West 2006)) to sign and affix the state seal to the document issued by the Governor appointing Roland Burris to the United States Senate, Petitioners are not entitled to an order from this court requiring the Secretary to perform those Acts. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 3:57 pm
United States, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 147, 151 (1873). [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:55 pm
We find that the district court properly exercised its discretion to impose a sentence without a presentence report under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(c)(1)(A)(ii) and United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 6A1.1(a)(2). [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:39 am
And in the United States, of course, you're allowed to publish true information, even if it hurts someone. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 1:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP… [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 8:42 am
Sealed Plaintiff v. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 5:34 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 4:28 am
" Under current law, reliance is usually the paradigm of an individual issue. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 10:16 am
The United States presented no r other evidence to controvert that offered by Knellinger. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 1:02 pm
The right of access of the press to search warrant materials was discussed at length by the Western District of Texas at El Paso in United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 12:46 am
— When the disclosure is made in a state proceeding and is not the subject of a state-court order concerning waiver, the disclosure does not operate as a waiver in a federal proceeding if the disclosure: (1) would not be a waiver under this rule if it had been made in a federal proceeding; or (2) is not a waiver under the law of the state where the disclosure occurred. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46) Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M & A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property Watch), Bosch, Xerox and Dupont sign up… [read post]
