Search for: "United States v. Bell"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,504
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 11:01 am
Brigham Young Univ. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 8:19 am
Proponents of this fallacy (such as the sponsors of the IRFA bill) leave out the July 6, 2012 ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Intercollegiate Broadcasting System Inc v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 6:12 pm
Homeland SecurityThe investigation and arrest of Prokopi is an outgrowth of the civil forfeiture case of United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 12:46 pm
Bell, 556 U.S. 180, 198 (2009) (Thomas, J., concurring). [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 2:48 am
Nos. 09-2185-cv(L), 10-4111 (Con) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 462 Fed. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm
Even if they are correct, the parties pressing for government antitrust action against Google cannot claim the courts have ever recognized the concept of natural monopoly as a surrogate for the United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 7:23 pm
” United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 6:06 am
United States, 498 U.S. 192 (1991), which recognized that a sincerely held belief that taxes were not legally owed was a defense that should be submitted to a jury. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am
LA Fitness International: Shifting Costs to Seek Fairness in Discovery – Reed Smith – http://bit.ly/NejzAg (Patricia Antezana) Warrantless Phone Search Deemed Unconstitutional; Destroys State’s Murder Case – http://bit.ly/P5BXJW (IT-Lex) We Produced Privileged Documents; Now What? [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:52 am
Perhaps in some other country a tale like this would not be surprising, but in modern United States one would not expect this kind of story. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm
Either way, Judge Dow’s decision is important because it will impact the few decisions post Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:10 am
See Bunney v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Department of State, respectively: ? [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
Bell [v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 11:50 am
In footnote 145 I state: "Judge Bell in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 4:53 pm
Yet in the case of United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
The United States’ Stolen Valor Act criminalized lies about the receipt of a military decoration. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 10:29 am
Bell (2002) to Yasui v. [read post]
