Search for: "United States v. Cutting" Results 781 - 800 of 4,680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2007, 10:16 pm
The first obligation of the president of the United States is to protect and defend the United States of America. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 2:15 am
Some 8,000 New Jersey residents may require assistance for medical and health problems because of their work near the site. v Makes Deep Cuts to Grants to States and First Responders. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:08 pm by LindaMBeale
  AT&T Mobility v Concepcion is only the latest foray in this direction. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 1:34 pm by Craig Newby and Jeffrey Conner
The program provides recipients with the ability to apply for work authorizations, which allow them to work legally in the United States. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 2:06 pm
See The Supreme Court’s next (cautious, careful) move into the digital age: "A new era of cutting-age technology begins Monday at the United States Supreme Court, as the public for the first time will be able to access briefs and other case documents on the court’s website. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 4:37 pm
The 6th Circuit still leaves the courts looking into the minds of religionists and assessing the religiosity of their motivations, when it would be better to be "done with this business of judicially examining other people's faiths" (to quote the last line of my all-time favorite judicial opinion, Justice Jackson dissenting in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:56 am by Sheldon Toplitt
A 19-year-old Univ. of Georgia freshman has sued the school district where she attended high school and a school administrator for $2 million in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia for using a bikini-clad Facebook image of her in a county-wide educational seminar without her permission.In Chelsea Chaney v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:03 pm by Jeffrey M. Goldstein
In so concluding, the Court ruled that Blanton, the plaintiff employee of a Domino’s franchisee, had adequately pled that Domino’s used the franchise agreements to orchestrate a conspiracy among their franchisees to not compete for labor; Blanton says that the no-hire provision is evidence of that conspiracy and violates the Sherman Antitrust Act because it unreasonably restrains competition for Domino’s franchise employees and depresses employee wages, lessens employee benefits,… [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:01 pm by Heidi Meinzer
Van Dusen and the IRS worked out some matters, but the issue over the Fix Our Ferals deduction went to trial in the United States Tax Court. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:02 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
Yesterday the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit released its opinion in Latif v. [read post]