Search for: "United States v. FEDERAL COMPANY" Results 781 - 800 of 12,463
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2014, 12:41 pm
Co., a 1957 opinion from the United States Supreme Court that seems pretty on point. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 8:40 pm by Patricia Salkin
 The nonprofit organization, Apache Stronghold, which sought to prevent land used by Apache from being conveyed from United States to mining company to facilitate mineral exploration activities, as authorized by National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), brought an action against United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), alleging that land was held in trust by United States for Apaches by way of 1852 Treaty and that mine would… [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:51 pm by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
In Dugas v. 3M Company, a man filed a lawsuit in Florida against several companies over his alleged exposure to asbestos fibers while serving in the United States Navy. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 11:31 am by Josh Blackman
" However, the Justices parted company on the next question: what precisely are the PROMESA board members? [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:10 am
These laws affect a broad range of public and private companies, including U.S. companies as well as foreign companies that conduct business in the United States. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:58 pm
In 1992, the Supreme Court of the United States heard a case called Quill v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:00 am
United States Supreme Court decisions provide guideposts for the exercise of environmental permitting and enforcement power by state and federal authorities. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 3:46 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Thompson (Prison Hair Length Policies, Native American Religious Freedom)United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2015dct.htmlSprint Communications Company L.P. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 12:55 pm by Steven Boutwell
Specifically, each case involves private companies that challenge the federal health care law’s mandate that employee health plans provide no-cost coverage for birth control products. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 1:57 pm
I have argued that the immunity grant appears constitutionally valid, at least as to a challenge under United States v. [read post]
Case date: 19 October 2021 Case number: No. 2020-1196 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
   This question was left unanswered for a very long time, until the United States Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court”) resolved it in  Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:30 am by Jeremy Tyler
While the standards for expert witness testimony may differ between state and federal courts, all federal courts are bound by Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Daubert v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 2:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Judge Fineman granted the motion in reliance on both California and United States authority. [read post]